Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Nvidia have the out right best performing card on the market with the RTX4090, AMD don’t have anything to match that. Next depends on price and what GPU, if you were looking at a 4080s vs 7900xtx I would generally advise to go with the 4080s due to its features and overall performance is better or worse in games than a 7900xtx depending on ...
Both work fine. Actually, all three work: AMD, Intel, Nvidia. AMD and Intel graphics work better on Linux than they work on Windows. Where Windows users may shy away from AMD and Intel, there's absolutely no reason to do so with Linux. Typically one can get more power for money with AMD, but with AMD cards being better at GPGPU processing, I ...
Outside of productivity, AMD cards are the best performance per dollar. If you stream, even casually to friends on Discord, NVIDIA is better. I used to have better stream quality with NVENC on my ancient 1050Ti + 4770 rig than I do now, even with hardware encoding turned off. Else AMD has better price to performance.
Dlss is better than FSR. (Higher quality) VR performance is for some reason higher. AMD abandoned LiquidVR. Encoding speed across the board is faster in NVIDIA. Some headsets only work with Nvidia, or work better with Nvidia. Varjo for example. The AMD 7000 series has had quite a few problems with VR performance.
For normal use AMD is way better, wayland out of the box wihout any issues is very good. Intel ARC is good too. If you care about DLSS, raytracing, Optix, CUDA, or HDMI 2.1 go with Nvidia. If none of those matter to you, AMD is good and cheaper.
Honestly, as a long time Nvidia buyer I will tell you straight: If you buy a GPU only to game, get AMD and Intel instead. Nvidia only has value now if you are a GPU multitasker i.e you use GPU for work and play. And is better value. Nvidia is better for the high end only if moneys not a problem.
NVIDIA GPUs are more power efficient and have superior features like Nvenc, DLSS, CUDA, and better raytracing; and are generally better for machine learning tasks or offline rendering. If you don't need any of that you can save like 20% buying an AMD GPU. Reply reply. Edgaras1103.
Performance wise AMD and NVIDIA will be about the same, but since AMD is cheaper, that means it has better performance per USD. There is almost no difference between 7800x3d, 7950x3d and 13900 in CPU performance: all 3 will give you 360+ in midgame with occasional drops below 240 in a truly stacked late game near mega city / jungle biom.
AMD has good RT but it's just less performant at a given price point than Nvidia's. RDNA2 Raytracing Is actually not far off from Ampere, and beats out Turing altogether. Ex: 6800XT is between a 3070 and 3080 in RT performance, above a 2080 Ti. The 6600 XT outperforms the RTX 3060, especially at 1080p.
The RX has a lot more horsepower generally speaking (performance slightly above 3070 TI) . However, being a streamer who uses OBS, I've heard bad things about the encoder, despite the performance gap between AMD and Nvidia becoming smaller and smaller. So here's my question: for a streamer is AMD's inferior encoder enough of a reason to switch ...