Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Euler's proof. Euler wrote the first proof of the fact that e is irrational in 1737 (but the text was only published seven years later). [1] [2] [3] He computed the representation of e as a simple continued fraction, which is. Since this continued fraction is infinite and every rational number has a terminating continued fraction, e is irrational.
The classic proof that the square root of 2 is irrational is a refutation by contradiction. [11] Indeed, we set out to prove the negation ¬ ∃ a, b ∈ . a/b = √ 2 by assuming that there exist natural numbers a and b whose ratio is the square root of two, and derive a contradiction.
Irrational number. The number √ 2 is irrational. In mathematics, the irrational numbers ( in- + rational) are all the real numbers that are not rational numbers. That is, irrational numbers cannot be expressed as the ratio of two integers. When the ratio of lengths of two line segments is an irrational number, the line segments are also ...
The following 1953 proof by Dov Jarden has been widely used as an example of a non-constructive proof since at least 1970: CURIOSA 339. A Simple Proof That a Power of an Irrational Number to an Irrational Exponent May Be Rational. is either rational or irrational. If it is rational, our statement is proved.
the latter inequality being true because it is assumed that 1< a / b < 3/2, giving a / b + √ 2 ≤ 3 (otherwise the quantitative apartness can be trivially established). This gives a lower bound of 1 / 3 b 2 for the difference | √ 2 − a / b | , yielding a direct proof of irrationality in its constructively ...
Then P(n) is true for all natural numbers n. For example, we can prove by induction that all positive integers of the form 2n − 1 are odd. Let P(n) represent "2n − 1 is odd": (i) For n = 1, 2n − 1 = 2(1) − 1 = 1, and 1 is odd, since it leaves a remainder of 1 when divided by 2. Thus P(1) is true.
The proof by Pythagoras about 500 BCE has had a profound effect on mathematics. It shows that the square root of 2 cannot be expressed as the ratio of two integers. The proof bifurcated "the numbers" into two non-overlapping collections—the rational numbers and the irrational numbers.
[2] [3] The adjective real, used in the 17th century by René Descartes, distinguishes real numbers from imaginary numbers such as the square roots of −1. [4] The real numbers include the rational numbers, such as the integer −5 and the fraction 4 / 3. The rest of the real numbers are called irrational numbers.