Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Tom Fitton is an American conservative activist and the president of Judicial Watch, a group that files lawsuits against government agencies and climate scientists. He is known for his pro-Trump commentary, his rejection of the scientific consensus on climate change, and his involvement in the 2020 election fraud conspiracy.
Judicial Watch is a conservative nonprofit organization that engages in activism and litigation against the Democratic Party and its allies. It is known for its conspiracy theories, false claims, and lawsuits involving topics such as voter fraud, climate change, and Trump.
NATIONAL HARBOR, Maryland—When Tom Fitton, president of the pro-Trump legal nonprofit Judicial Watch, took the stage at the 2024 Conservative Political Action Conference on Saturday, he began ...
Tom Fitton, the president of the conservative watchdog Judicial Watch, added, “Not funny, then or now.” Ryan Wesley Routh, 58, of Hawaii is accused of trying to assassinate Trump on Sunday ...
Trump faces 40 felony counts for allegedly retaining and concealing classified documents after his presidency. The case is the first federal indictment of a former U.S. president and was dismissed by a judge but appealed by the special counsel.
PHOTO: Attorney John Sauer, center, presents arguments for former President Donald Trump, right, as E. Jean Carroll, second from right, looks on in Manhattan federal court, Sept. 6, 2024, in New York.
Taitz published the Judicial Watch employee's comment on her website. Klayman sued Judicial Watch for defamation, and in 2014, a federal jury awarded Klayman $156,000 in compensatory damages and $25,000 in punitive damages. [103] In 2019, however, Judicial Watch obtained a $2.3 million verdict against Klayman in a trademark dispute. [104] [105]
Tom Fitton, president of activist group Judicial Watch, advised Trump in February 2022 not to give any more records to NARA. [69] As justification, Fitton cited a 2012 case in which a federal judge said that NARA had no authority to designate materials as "presidential records" nor did it have the right to seize materials.