24/7 Pet Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United States free speech exceptions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_free_speech...

    United States free speech exceptions. The Bill of Rights in the National Archives. In the United States, some categories of speech are not protected by the First Amendment. According to the Supreme Court of the United States, the U.S. Constitution protects free speech while allowing limitations on certain categories of speech. [1]

  3. Cohen v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cohen_v._California

    Cohen v. California. Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15 (1971), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court holding that the First Amendment prevented the conviction of Paul Robert Cohen for the crime of disturbing the peace by wearing a jacket displaying "Fuck the Draft " in the public corridors of a California courthouse.

  4. First Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the...

    Text Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. The hand-written copy of the proposed articles of amendment passed by Congress in 1789, cropped to show just the text ...

  5. 1992 Los Angeles riots - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1992_Los_Angeles_riots

    The 1992 Los Angeles riots (also called the South Central riots, Rodney King riots or the 1992 Los Angeles uprising) were a series of riots and civil disturbances that occurred in Los Angeles County, California, United States, during April and May 1992.

  6. United States v. Williams (2008) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Williams...

    United States v. Williams, 553 U.S. 285 (2008), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that a federal statute prohibiting the "pandering" of child pornography (offering or requesting to transfer, sell, deliver, or trade the items) did not violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, even if a person charged under the code did in fact not possess child ...

  7. Opinion: USC got it wrong in canceling valedictorian's speech ...

    www.aol.com/news/opinion-usc-got-wrong-canceling...

    Particularly since Oct. 7, university administrators have tough jobs requiring them to balance commitments to free speech, a vibrant and respectful academic culture, and campus safety. That said ...

  8. California voters to weigh proposal to ban forced prison ...

    www.aol.com/news/california-voters-weigh...

    June 27, 2024 at 4:03 PM. SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California voters will decide in November whether to remove an exemption for involuntary servitude from the state constitution under a ...

  9. Yates v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yates_v._United_States

    Yates v. United States, 354 U.S. 298 (1957), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that the First Amendment protected radical and reactionary speech, unless it posed a "clear and present danger".