Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Elsagate (derived from Elsa and the -gate scandal suffix) is a controversy surrounding videos on YouTube and YouTube Kids that were categorized as "child-friendly", but contained themes inappropriate for children. These videos often featured fictional characters from family-oriented media, sometimes via crossovers, used without legal permission.
Legal frameworks around fictional pornography depicting minors vary depending on country and nature of the material involved. Laws against production, distribution and consumption of child pornography generally separate images into three categories: real, pseudo, and virtual. Pseudo-photographic child pornography is produced by digitally ...
In the United States, child pornography laws do not apply to drawings, cartoons, sculptures, and paintings of minors in sexual situations under 18 U.S.C. § 2256. However, they remain subject to obscenity laws if they do not pass the Miller test and are potentially illegal under 18 U.S.C. § 1466A . The subgenres have also been made illegal in ...
He would never, though, let his own children watch. In addition to Smile Kids TV, The Sun notes other channels with disturbing videos are Lord Bad Baby, Toys 4 Fun!, Toys and Funny Kids Surprise ...
Stormfront.org, a neo-Nazi's Web site set up in 1995, is considered the first major domestic "hate site" on the World Wide Web because of its depth of content and its presentation style which represented a new period for online right-wing extremism. Eshman, Rob (December 23, 2008). "Jewish Money".
Some of his cartoons use suicide among transgender people as a punchline. [7] Reddit and Discord banned their respective official StoneToss communities in 2019. [1] On Facebook and Instagram, as of 2021, some of the cartoons were posted by the author in heavily pixellated versions to prevent them from breaching those platforms' policies. [11]
The French newspaper Libération reprints the Mohammed cartoons anew, to highlight the start of a trial against another French newspaper, Charlie Hebdo, and in support of free speech. The trial was initiated by several major Muslim organizations who sued Charlie Hebdo because of their decision to publish the cartoons in February 2006.
In January 2023, cartoonist Scott Adams announced that he was considering taking legal action regarding a Garrison cartoon about his views on vaccines. [33] As Garrison's cartoons became more widespread, they have been regularly edited online including by Advance New Zealand and critics of the Bharatiya Janata Party and Indian National Congress ...