24/7 Pet Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ohio Supreme Court to consider red-light camera case - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/ohio-supreme-court-consider-red...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  3. Terry v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_v._Ohio

    Supreme Court of Ohio affirmed. U.S. Const. amends. IV, XIV. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the court ruled that it is constitutional for American police to "stop and frisk" a person they reasonably suspect to be armed and involved in a crime. Specifically, the decision held that a police ...

  4. Ohio v. Robinette - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_v._Robinette

    Ohio v. Robinette, 519 U.S. 33 (1996), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Fourth Amendment does not require police officers to inform a motorist at the end of a traffic stop that they are free to go before seeking permission to search the motorist's car .

  5. Speed limit enforcement - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_limit_enforcement

    In the U.S. state of Ohio, the issue of whether a city has jurisdiction under the Ohio Constitution to issue citations based on speed cameras was heard by the Ohio Supreme Court on 18 September 2007, in the case of Kelly Mendenhall et al. v. The City of Akron et al. The court ruled in favor of Kelly Mendenhall.

  6. Ohio traffic laws: Here's what changed in 2023 and what could ...

    www.aol.com/ohio-traffic-laws-heres-changed...

    A fine of up to $150 and two points on your license for the first offense. A fine of up to $250 and three points on your license for a second offense within two years. A fine of up to $500, four ...

  7. DeRolph v. State - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeRolph_v._State

    DeRolph v. State is a landmark case in Ohio constitutional law in which the Supreme Court of Ohio ruled that the state's method for funding public education was unconstitutional. [1] On March 24, 1997, the Supreme Court of Ohio ruled in a 4–3 decision that the state funding system "fails to provide for a thorough and efficient system of ...

  8. Zelman v. Simmons-Harris - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zelman_v._Simmons-Harris

    Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, 536 U.S. 639 (2002), was a 5–4 decision of the United States Supreme Court that upheld an Ohio program that used school vouchers.The Court decided that the program did not violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, as long as parents using the program were allowed to choose among a range of secular and religious schools.

  9. Supreme Court directs Ohio's top court to take another look ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-directs-ohios-top...

    The Ohio Supreme Court twice struck down congressional maps drawn by Republican officials after the 2020 census, although the second map nonetheless was used in the 2022 elections. That map ...